, ,

Darren writes to government on rectal mesh

Currently, the forthcoming healthcare review covering vaginal mesh does not cover rectal mesh, which has similarly affected women. That includes many who were treated at Southmead Hospital. Darren wrote to the government to make it clear that he thinks that this is wrong. You can read the full letter here:

 

Dear Jackie Doyle-Price MP

 

Inclusion of rectal mesh in review into patient safety

I am writing in order to ask that rectal mesh is included in Baroness Cumberlege’s review into patient safety. This is because rectal mesh has compromised patient safety.

Rectal mesh was inserted into women’s bodies by surgeon Anthony Dixon, at Southmead Hospital in my constituency of Bristol North West. These women were hoping to receive treatment for serious medical issues including rectal prolapse. But the meshes have left some of these women with unmanageable pain, or incontinence.

The review was announced by Jeremy Hunt on the 21st of February 2018. It has the stated purpose of reviewing what happened when three different treatments compromised patient safety, and making recommendations on what should happen next. Rectal mesh, despite its effect on patient safety, was not included in the review.

It is unclear why vaginal mesh is included in the review, but rectal mesh is not. Both rectal mesh and vaginal mesh have resulted in women suffering serious side effects.

I hope that you will consider increasing the scope of the review to include rectal mesh.

Kind regards,

 

Darren Jones MP

 

 

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *